Frank Luciano Blog

CONSUMER FRAUD LAW IN BERGEN AND PASSAIC COUNTIES: THE BROAD SCOPE OF NEW JERSEY'S CONSUMER FRAUD ACT

As I have explained many times in the past, New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act (CFA)is conceived to be "one of the strongest consumer protection laws in the nation." The primary purpose of the CFA is to protect the consumer against loss resulting from fraudulent practices by persons engaged in the sale of goods and services.

In May, the Appellate Division decided a case involving a CFA claim filed by a homeowner against a "cleaning and restoration" service that was hired to remediate a finished basement damaged by a flood. After a protracted procedural history, the trial court issued a judgment in favor of the homeowner including over $40,000 in attorney fees and costs. The trial court also concluded that the homeowner did not have to pay the restoration company the balance of the contract price despite the fact that the work had been completed.(See prior blog postings on this issue). One of the major issues in the trial court's analysis of the controversy related to the fact that the remediation company failed to specifically identify the cost of the work in its contract. 

On appeal, the remediation company argued that it was not a home improvement contractor and as a result, it did not have any responsibility to follow the requirements of the statute that relates to home improvement contractors. (Statute). The company also said that the homeowner had received a windfall because of its technical breach when the court discharged the homeowner's responsibility to pay the balance of this contract's value.

In rejecting the remediation company's arguments, the court looked to the language of the Statute which defines material and service providers as those who remodel, alter, paint, renovate or restore residential property. The court then observed that the advertisement disseminated by the remediation company said rather clearly that it was a "cleaning and restoration" franchise. 

As to the second argument, the Appellate Division concluded that there was no evidence presented by the restoration company that would justify depriving the homeowner of the right under the CFA to obtain a dismissal of the restoration company's claim for payment.

Frank T. Luciano, Esq., is a trial lawyer in Bergen County,  Passaic County, Hudson County and Morris County, with over thirty years of experieince, who specializes in complex civil litigation, including  legal malpractice, construction claims, wrongful death actions, wills and estate contests and liquor law liability cases. 

Labels: attorney CFA CFA in New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Consumer Fraud Act in NJ Consumer Law Consumer Law in Bergen County Consumer Law in Passaic County Fraudulent practices Home Improvement Contractor lawyer new jersey